InQuery vs CaseFleet
InQuery vs CaseFleet: Auto-Generated Medical Chronologies or a Litigation Fact-Management Platform
CaseFleet gives you the workspace to build the chronology yourself. InQuery hands you the finished, source-linked chronology. Do-it-yourself versus done-for-you.
Last updated
InQuery and CaseFleet get compared a lot, but they sit on opposite sides of one question: who builds the chronology? CaseFleet is litigation fact-management software — a workspace where your team assembles the case timeline by linking facts to evidence. InQuery is a done-for-you service — records go in, and a finished, source-linked medical chronology comes back, reviewed by a clinical QA team.
If your team has the time and wants better tooling, that’s one path. If the chronology work itself is the bottleneck, that’s the other.
What each platform actually does
CaseFleet is case-timeline and fact-management software for litigation teams. You create fact records, link them to specific pieces of evidence, and build a searchable, sourced timeline your team maintains across the life of the case. It’s a strong workspace for teams who want to keep the analysis in-house, with transparent per-user pricing.
InQuery processes medical records into source-linked chronologies and summaries with a mandatory human QA layer. The AI plus a clinical review team does the work; you receive a finished chronology where every entry links to a specific page and Bates number. InQuery serves plaintiff and defense firms plus carriers, IROs, MSP consultants, and adjusters, and its output imports into fact-management tools, demand platforms, and custom templates.
When to choose InQuery
- Chronology-building is eating your team’s hours and you want the work removed, not relocated.
- You want a finished, source-linked chronology with mandatory QA, defensible under cross — not a workspace to assemble one. Our medical record summary mistakes guide shows what QA catches.
- You handle high medical-record volume where manual timeline assembly doesn’t scale.
- You work either side of the v and want the chronology done for you every time.
When to choose CaseFleet
- You want to keep case analysis in-house and give your team a better fact-management workspace.
- Your matters span many practice areas and you need a general litigation timeline tool, not just medical chronologies.
- You prefer a self-serve per-user tool your paralegals operate directly.
Plenty of firms run both — InQuery for the source-linked medical chronology, CaseFleet for the broader case timeline. For choosing a record-review vendor on the dimensions that matter, see our platform features evaluation guide.
Feature comparison
| Feature | InQuery | CaseFleet |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Done-for-you — records in, a finished source-linked chronology out, with human QA | Do-it-yourself workspace — your team builds the timeline by linking facts to evidence |
| Primary output | Source-linked medical chronology, attorney-ready as a standalone deliverable | A case timeline / fact database your team assembles and maintains |
| Source-linking depth | Every entry auto-links back to a specific page and Bates number, every time | Facts link to evidence you attach and cite manually |
| Who does the work | InQuery's AI + clinical QA team produces the chronology for you | Your paralegals and attorneys build and maintain the timeline in the software |
| Human QA | Mandatory clinical + QA layer included on every chronology | Quality depends on your team's review inside the tool |
| Who it serves | Plaintiff and defense PI firms, insurance carriers, IROs, MSP consultants, and adjusters | Litigation teams across practice areas |
| Security & compliance | SOC 2 Type II certified, HIPAA compliant, BAA available | SOC 2; standard legal-software security |
| Pricing model | Per-chronology or volume subscription (custom) | Per-user monthly subscription |
Frequently asked questions
Are InQuery and CaseFleet the same kind of tool?
No — and that's the key distinction. CaseFleet is fact-management software: a workspace where your team builds the case timeline by linking facts to evidence. InQuery is a done-for-you service: you send the records and get back a finished, source-linked medical chronology with human QA. One is a tool you operate; the other is a deliverable you receive.
Which is better if my paralegals are already overloaded?
If record review and chronology-building is eating your paralegals' time, a done-for-you chronology removes the work rather than giving them a better place to do it. InQuery produces the chronology so your team reviews and litigates instead of assembling. If you'd rather keep the build in-house with better tooling, CaseFleet is designed for that.
Can I use InQuery chronologies inside CaseFleet?
Yes. Many firms use both: InQuery generates the source-linked medical chronology, and the team imports or references it inside their fact-management workspace for the broader case timeline. The page-level and Bates citations carry through.
Does CaseFleet do the medical record review for me?
CaseFleet gives your team the workspace to organize facts and evidence, but the record review and chronology assembly is done by your people inside the tool. InQuery's model is the opposite — the AI plus a clinical QA team does the review and produces the chronology as the deliverable.
How do I decide which to evaluate first?
Decide who does the work. If you want to keep chronology-building in-house with stronger software, evaluate CaseFleet. If you want the chronology done for you and handed back defensible, run one of your real files through InQuery. Start here: /get-started
See how InQuery handles your records
Run a real file through both. The differences show up in the source-linked chronology, the QA layer, and the security posture.
Start with InQuery